Latest News
- Fri. Jun. 7, 2013
Flamborough Review
FORCE recipient of Environmentalist of the Year award - Wed., Apr. 24, 2013
Hamilton Spectator
Mahoney: Quarry foes set to celebrate holding their ground - Mon., Apr. 8, 2013
Flamborough Review
Quarry battle over opponents say - Wed.,Mar. 27, 2013
Flamborough Review
FORCE ready to celebrate quarry victory - Thurs., Mar. 14, 2013
Flamborough Review
My View: The community that could
2004 Annual Report
Excerpts from Relevant Reports
We know the time spent by FORCE volunteers developing relationships with and informing
interested organization and agencies has been worthwhile when we see comments like this in a
City of Hamilton Report to Council…
“The Planning and Development Department has circulated the development proposal to
all concerned departments and agencies. In particular, all the proponents supporting studies
have been sent to the School Boards, Region of Halton, Town of Milton, City of Burlington,
Conservation Halton, Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing for circulation to Ministry of
Transportation, Ministry of Natural Resources, and Ministry of Environment. The Niagara
Escarpment Commission has also requested to participate in the review of the applications
and has been provided the documentation submitted. Preliminary comments received from these
agencies have identified significant concerns. The type of issues range from concerns
regarding student safety and impact on water quality in the schools from the
Hamilton-Wentworth District School Board and Hamilton-Wentworth Catholic District School
Board, to deficiencies in the environmental work identified by Conservation Halton. The
surrounding municipalities of the Region of Halton, Town of Milton, and the City of Burlington
have major concerns with traffic, environmental impacts, water quality and quantity etc. All
concerns will be further evaluated as part of the City’s peer review and the Combined
Aggregate Review Team process.”
The full examination of the Lowndes Holdings application includes a peer review process,
paid for by the proponent. The City is very clear about the lines of authority for this
process…
“It is important to acknowledge that while the proponent is providing funding to
the City to pay for the peer reviews, the City’s Peer Review Team reports directly to
the City’s Director of Development and Real Estate and not to the proponent. The Peer
Review Team is accountable to the City. This arrangement is required so that the City has
access to resources and expertise that would otherwise not be available to ensure that the
proponent provides sufficient information to evaluate the proposals, that there is a thorough
technical review, and that the interests and issues that are within the City’s mandate
are properly addressed.”
The issues we have with the proposed Quarry are shared with other municipalities and
agencies…
“There are three major issues of concern to the Town of Milton. These include traffic
impact, hydrogeological impacts from dewatering of the Amabel Aquifer and any downstream
impacts on natural systems as a result of the proposal.”
There are serious environmental issues which have not been adequately addressed and further, the applications are contrary to the Provincial Policy Statement (Policies 2.3.1 Natural Heritage, 2.3.2, 2.3.3, 2.4.1 Water Quality and Quantity), contrary to the Hamilton Wentworth Official Plan (Part C, Policies 1.1 Environmentally Significant Areas 1.1.2, 2.2.9 Mineral Aggregates), and contrary to the Flamborough Official Plan (Policies B.1.10 Wetlands, B.7.4(iii), C.3 Environmentally Significant Areas). The proposal gives limited consideration to the impacts of the proposed extraction on the environmentally significant areas, provincially significant wetlands, fish habitat, significant wildlife habitat, endangered or threatened species, ecological linkages/wildlife corridors, hydrology and hydrogeology. Nor does the applicant adequately address mitigation measures and monitoring to ensure that these features are protected during the proposed extraction and rehabilitation phases, and following rehabilitation.”
Our fact finding has validated our earlier statement, that no responsible person would
approve aggregate extraction in this area:
The Lowndes Holdings property contains significant natural features and functions that
contribute to the biological diversity and ecological integrity of the region.
This is based on the geographic extent of natural features present, the diversity of
communities represented, the quality of natural areas, the hydrologic attributes of
wetlands and creeks and the interconnectedness of the natural areas. Few areas of
southern Ontario have this combination of natural attributes and it is for this reason
that so many natural heritage features have been designated by programs such as the
Areas of Natural and Scientific Interest (ANSI), the Environmentally Significant Areas
(ESA) program of the City of Hamilton, the Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESA) program
of the Region of Halton, the Wetland Evaluation Manual for Southern Ontario that
designates Provincially Significant Wetlands (PSW), the Greenbelt Taskforce, the Big
Picture project, and the Bronte Creek Watershed study of Conservation Halton.
As we build our case through the commissioning of expert reviews our worst fears are
concerns are being confirmed:
The Carlisle municipal water supply wells that draw drinking water from the Amabel
Formation dolostone aquifer, are also at risk of being adversely affected by the
proposed Quarry. Pumping of large volumes of groundwater from the Quarry will change
the well capture zones and WHPAs of the Carlisle wells. The new well capture zones
may encounter potential contaminant sources and other groundwater quality and
quantity issues not previously identified or considered prior to Quarry operation.
There are assessment requirements under the Province’s new Watershed-Based
Source Protection Planning initiative specifically directed to proposed new quarries
that must be considered and completed. Under this initiative, because the proposed
Quarry is located within the 2 year capture zone or WHPA for the Carlisle wells, the
risk posed by the Quarry and final Quarry land use to these wells needs to assessed
and/or the development of the Quarry restricted. Since the Quarry will be allowed
to flood following aggregate extraction, the resulting surface water also potentially
poses a bacteriological/pathogenic threat to the Carlisle municipal wells that may
necessitate upgrading of treatment requirements for these wells. None of these
issues have been discussed or addressed by the proponent.
The City of Hamilton acknowledges FORCE as the Community's representative on the
issue of the quarry, and has included FORCE in the Review and Decision Making Process.
...the Aggregate Planning Advisor has been working with City staff to assist in
review of the development applications, selecting the City’s Peer Review Team,
and meeting with City staff, the proponent and their consultants. He has also met
with representatives from the residents' group FORCE to discuss the City’s
approach to the review of these applications.